Posted in Escalation on 05/22/2010 06:59 pm by admin
Inspired by circular proximity, there are numerous collections of continuous movements which only border circumferential boundaries. Removing any conflicting data, only a few assumptions remain at certain times of observation. The original circular proximity remains undefined when further continuous movements propel vectors in reversed circles (assuming the subsequent circumference borders the original boundary). The continuous movements are fourfold: vertical, horizontal, circular, and other. The *horizontal movement* is the one that garners the most attention when observation/attention is primarily directed to its source. Any incongruous vertical movements are disregarded when past observations result in a removal of attention. Over 750 years ago, a primary circular motion on a horizontal plane was observed, tallied, and displayed in a tabular manner. The penultimate observation almost concluded that horizontal motion appearing with circular motion should sometimes be tallied, but this observation was quickly ignored. **Original circular proximity**: The first, circumferential closeness to a boundary *can be* considered an original circular proximity, especially when incongruous vertical movements are sometimes present. Note that any thoughts before or after this notion may be similar. Any movement escalating along a horizontal surface, a circular surface, or a vertical surface has bearing on at least one thought-formed dimension (be it space, distance, or downward-motion), when such movements occur and bear on these dimensions. When a movement becomes continuous, the perception of circumferences, boundaries, and conflicting data sometimes becomes more apparent.

Posted in Perceptivity on 05/11/2010 02:57 am by admin
When reversed resultants happen to vectors, a miniature planet-based circular system could result. Momentum might be described as a continued force of movement; however, assuming that each point in calendrical time is not connected (i.e. disparate, discrete), then momentum could be described as a *series* of movements interwoven on an interleaved scale using calculus based limits. For example, say a ball is thrown. The ball appears to move in curved vector space — a contiguous movement, like a momentum-based vector. If one takes a snapshot of the ball during travel, the ball appears stationary in the snapshot. Assumptions may point to the fact the ball is moving. If a ball is thrown, it is likely moving. Removing such assumptions, the ball is likely stationary assuming that it stops. If two photographs are taken during the continued vector movement of the ball through space, the object will appear in two places if the camera remains stationary. If one moves the camera and the surrounding environment along with the object thrown, then what actually moves? If everything moves *along with* the ball, then is the ball stationary? Or moving using non calculus limits?

The answers are found in a **third** photograph. For the more astute readers of this important news blog, one remembers a brief and limited mention of tertiary sound. The third (tertiary) sound is actually the third photograph. The photograph *is* the sound. Using a third snapshot will reveal without qualification whether the imaginary ball is moving, stationary, or moving in curved vector space in contiguous movements within or without the environment. In a previous illustration of vacuum vector space, a point is perceived as an intersection of two lines. The flaw in this is that only two dimensions are intersected (disregarding vacuum dimension, of course). When the third, fourth, and fifth vacuum motion dimensions are perceived using meticulous step-by-step detailed analysis, then vector movements, momentum vectors, and moving/non-moving environmental factors become amusingly apparent.

Posted in Measurement on 05/02/2010 03:24 am by admin
Between any two points, there exists a random interpolation of binary queries which coexist in sub-scientific observation. The only reason such interpolation can be random is that for a binary query to sustain its existence, the initial point can be measured spectroscopically if the second point is demarcated anti-gravitically. Originally, it was thought to be a simple comparison between two elemental points. For example assume that an imaginary quantity of bismuth, carbon and bromine are compared using mass-based weight/measurement systems. Now imagine that there is no weight; no gravity, and using only anti-gravity demarcation. The results may appear to contradict previously extrapolated observation(s) when an element of randomness is interpolated non-binarily. When tertiary sound waves counterbalance the three equal measures of carbon, bromine, and random bismuth, the first elemental point becomes a spectroscopic anomaly when analyzed using thought-based conceptual comparisons. Fortunately, with the help of an attempted photo of space polarized with *anti-gravity* constants, these ideas may become clear. Following is a representation of an instant interpolated gravitational event:

interpolated gravity in motion

If one considers using such a photograph to think about the causal effects of systematic weight based measurements, then carbon bromine, and bismuth are no more necessary than previously imagined for said measurements. Some may take a dim stance on the conservation of energetics used at distances greater than one light year from the initial observation point, but otherworldly comparisons seem to coexist with the chance of a random interpolation.