Reversing Orbit Folding Distance Awareness

To reverse a distant and consequential lattice of vertical awareness, one may consider folding an orbital distance onto itself. A lattice may sometimes divide consciousness into a vertical and horizontal plane, unless a substantial vertical awareness of orbit, distance, and the process of folding is initially perceived. This almost always tends to reverse consciously perceived distances, especially when basic measurements are used. The following composed series of numbers clarifies some of the orbital distances when reversals are not desired: 1, 29, 938, 32, and 48 (in base 2). 29 distance measurements can be factored into a perceived lattice, when the effect of the numbers 32 and 938 begin to wane. Then 48 (base 2) orbital measurements are required for such a computation to be evaluated. Reviewing the following helps focus the innate measurements:

Unsubstantiated vertical awareness: orbital distance
Divided consciousness: initial perception
Folding process: 1, 29, 938 (disregard 32 and 48)

When distance awareness begins to orbit, timing may be essential. To try to focus perception at a given time requires some values of concentration. For example, to perceive a timer precisely when its counting reaches “zero” requires a measure of focus; one might think the odds are greater to perceive the timer just before it reaches zero. Wait too long, and the calculation extends past zero. This may be important news to some, but an analogy might be to find a stick drawing done with stone bark and throw it into the air — at what point does it stop rising and start falling? To assign a time to that precise event could require a modicum of timing. Too fast, it’s still rising. Too slow, it has started descent. Hence the need to assign vertical awareness of a lattice (consequential) to fold the orbital timing into the non-perceived distance.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,  

3 Comments

  1. Raul Koluume

    After surfing the web all day today, I have found your information useful; especially the escalation vs clouds part, and the stone drawing allegories. Always important and newsworthy for me.

  2. The folding process is great! I like to fold, and then unfold. My perception reverses the stick in the distance. Only then does important news come into my awareness. When you throw your stick drawing on stone in the air, does it always rise, and then fall? Or is there a suspension (of either amazement or particles).

  3. Orbital distances are very interesting when found on a perceptual lattice. I am fascinated with your discussion on this matter. Consequential importance is a great analogy when you discuss the lattice orbitals (relative to orbital distances). I can think of no other words that express my satisfaction while reading your words.

Leave a Reply