## Reversed Vector Based Resultants

Posted in Perceptivity on 05/11/2010 02:57 am by adminWhen reversed resultants happen to vectors, a miniature planet-based circular system could result. Momentum might be described as a continued force of movement; however, assuming that each point in calendrical time is not connected (i.e. disparate, discrete), then momentum could be described as a *series* of movements interwoven on an interleaved scale using calculus based limits. For example, say a ball is thrown. The ball appears to move in curved vector space — a contiguous movement, like a momentum-based vector. If one takes a snapshot of the ball during travel, the ball appears stationary in the snapshot. Assumptions may point to the fact the ball is moving. If a ball is thrown, it is likely moving. Removing such assumptions, the ball is likely stationary assuming that it stops. If two photographs are taken during the continued vector movement of the ball through space, the object will appear in two places if the camera remains stationary. If one moves the camera and the surrounding environment along with the object thrown, then what actually moves? If everything moves *along with* the ball, then is the ball stationary? Or moving using non calculus limits?

The answers are found in a **third** photograph. For the more astute readers of this important news blog, one remembers a brief and limited mention of tertiary sound. The third (tertiary) sound is actually the third photograph. The photograph *is* the sound. Using a third snapshot will reveal without qualification whether the imaginary ball is moving, stationary, or moving in curved vector space in contiguous movements within or without the environment. In a previous illustration of vacuum vector space, a point is perceived as an intersection of two lines. The flaw in this is that only two dimensions are intersected (disregarding vacuum dimension, of course). When the third, fourth, and fifth vacuum motion dimensions are perceived using meticulous step-by-step detailed analysis, then vector movements, momentum vectors, and moving/non-moving environmental factors become amusingly apparent.

05/16/2010 at 3:19 am

The vector space articulation seems a bit obtuse, but otherwise a neat article. Some illustrations referencing the diagrams would be helpful.

05/16/2010 at 3:20 am

I love your explanations of vacuum space; it was (and is) a dimension I wish I was aware of earlier.

05/16/2010 at 3:21 am

Your listing of the different motions, momentums, and space really are well stated. On other parts of your blog, you bring all this information together into one condensed and consolidated space. I could use a bit more help understanding the interleavened scale, as well as more stationary ball examples. But otherwise, your blog is very clear, and really helps me understand my own day to day life.

05/16/2010 at 3:22 am

We appreciate your blog — we’ve learned more from reading your blog than we would sitting on a bench in some uninvented dimension.