Important News Blog

For the past few months, some study and effort may have gone into comparing orbital space and its trans-polar vectors. Many may be aware that space can occupy a plane; however, when orbital space occupies a non-polar plane, the mechanics of interaction may defer to one of the trans-polar vectors (usually the first or second one). Take, for example, the distance between the second and third vector. The measurement of the distance may be difficult to ascertain because orbital movement is constantly in motion. But once the measurement is made, this figure can be used to inversely calculate not only the width, but the vertical distance between the orbit and the vector. The following image may provide some clarity regarding these details.

What can be done with this information? Obviously, the initial measurements may not be of much use, but when one encounters a non-polar plane in conjunction with one or more vectors, the characteristics of such a plane can be compared with the details of this one! If an observer or an analyst creates an illustration based on the details of nearby orbital space and then compares it to the illustration, above, the results have the possibility of being overwhelmingly uncanny. Note the angle of the 3rd vector: it appears to be leaning towards the left. Actually, because the space occupied is in more than 8 dimensions, there is actually no leaning whatsoever. It is an illusion based on the perception of just two or three dimensions. That’s why this information is so interesting and important; it compares the normal dimensional perception with an enhanced “more-than-eight” dimensional model and shows the interrelationship between orbital space, vectors, and trans-polar modalities.

Curvature of the stellar cosmological space conforms to inter-dimensional foundations. Overdeveloped curvature and underdeveloped tangential foundations consist of forms that only result in dimensional space analysis when certain standards are applied to the original cosmology. One may assume, “important space, dimension and curvature have intermediate textures as their foundation,” if no regard is given to non-conformist (relativistic) standards when applying thought processes to controlling the measurement.

Stellar dimensional space consists of:
a.) motion
b.) vacuum space
c.) lines and curves
d.) etheric dimensions
e.) countable dimensions

Fluid foundation without curvature consists of:
a.) lack of curvature
b.) foundation that is fluid
c.) foundation without curvature

When fluid foundation is extracted from the excess curvature of stellar cosmological space, an analysis of dimension may conform to some specific and relativistic standard when vacuum space, lack of curvature, and controlled tangential foundations are studied. If one refers to the following illustration (previously shown in the upcoming past lecture), the idea that space has intermediate textures that conform to relativistic standards becomes clear:

If one discerns parts of the above displayed illustration, a very odd fluidic motion becomes apparent. When reversed, curves become lines, angular dimension becomes etheric, and fluid changes into a textured dimensional foundation. Three colors are of utmost interest to those who explain their interest to displayed fields of time and dimension. The first color is red, the second color is yellow, and the third color is not currently named, as it has been previously unidentified. Simplistic views of this third color may follow.

In a transitional expression of distant space, one cannot always expect linear dimensions to follow adverse, and inverse interpretations. Four hundred expressions are sometimes calculated when measuring distant space (considering the first fifty, followed by three hundred and fifty). Measuring a linear dimension in reversed space may produce the following:

a.) Results.
b.) Spacing of distance.
c.) Dimensional circular space.
d.) Insufficient results.

Further calculations are assumed when linearity is taken into consideration. Continuous movement is sometimes seen. When proximity limits the horizontal transitions, the adverse vertical transition would be considered.

When liquid material casts a shadow on a space based (spacial) vector, a shadow is formed during a particular calculation. The average distance between all liquids and all shadowed light forms have to be quantified (and calculated) when the amount of distance is desired in a space-based plane. If darkness emanate from within a given liquid, the original light must be measured if one wishes to take into consideration the aforesaid quantitative measures where vectors are required. The basis for all liquified matter (e.g. water, etc.) has to be gathered into a generalized formula when doing non-vector based calculations and comparisons on liquid matter vs less-than-shallow shadows. Angular dimensions play a part in the final measurements, but only before darkness displaces light. Using the following photograph (shadowed vector), an interpolation of liquid vector-based lightness might be inferred:

Note that any momentum which may be implied in the shadowed vector provides inconclusive data. This data is only tangential to the abstraction evidenced by continuous momentum when darkness mobilizes initial light vectors. One can only conclude three (3) data points. These data points should be referenced, topically, in a future document. Such a document could exist in a future 28,430 years from today’s date (if only as a back-reference to a previously implied date). If space allows, a linear photograph taken 29,000 years in the future may be posted here. With such dimensional analysis, the distance would be only an epoch used for the conclusion of the previously-mentioned data points. Continuous momentum may help average a given liquid’s distance, but only when converting non-vector based analysis on liquid matter comparisons. Further research on this matter is undoubtedly a necessity for those that consider liquid vs shadow calculations necessary.

On Monday, July 16, 1257, there will be an formal lecture, followed by an evening get together with a guest speaker and some treats. The lecture will cover three of the topics already covered in this important news blog:

Escalation
Interplanetary Minerals
Space and Dimension

Please note the lecturer is new; no heckling or jokes, and please silence your communicators while attending. As a special treat, we’ll have an evening guest speaker lecturing on:

allegory
universe and its center

After the lecture, some delicious edibles and fresh water will be served.

Please wear clothing appropriate to the 13th century, and if you cannot attend this function, there may be a future lecture announced for the 11th century.

The escalation, movement, and reversal of calendrical time, distant space, and vacuum-space may have a coordinated basis in a phenomenon related to a particular revision theory demonstrated by the original extraterrestrial time-space thinkers. Believe me, I know this sounds quite plausible, but it would be thoughtful to use a bit of skepticism when considering such a normally empiric “revision theory” cause. Those that have learned how calendar related time can be made to collapse by repeating certain actions at ever-shortening, ever-decreasing intervals (escalation not included), have experienced first hand the immediate dimensional shift that the broadening of consciousness may provide to sentience. Various and cultured ways of considering uninhabited continents located in remote, far away, and distant isles only preclude any emphasis on the escalation and reversal of time-space, as the only appropriate and plausible consideration which remains cannot be broadened without reluctantly discerning unrelated possibilities. To collapse such time eludes the initial movement and evaluation of non-probability and delineated origins discussed in my recent ancient particle perception posting. As the secondary kinds of sounds article states, “Although the initial sound level … remains constant,” similarly, the perceptual emphasized reversal of vacuum-space, sound, and similar measurements can be related to the broadening of consciousness.

Sometimes, the clarification of distance compared to time results in an affinity towards the depth of space. When important news travels to a distant point beyond a galaxy, it can be imagined how eventful its discovery becomes. When one measures the distance of an inner space, and then turns around and applies that measurement to an outer limit of sorts, there is no turning back. Time simply amplifies the distortion perceived during the measurement, itself. To clarify further, consider two points. Consider how much space each point takes up (a point’s “footprint”). If truly a “point,” then chances are that the footprint is no greater than a limit of imagination. Based on those two points, it is important (and newsworthy) to define an outer region when necessary. Then, whoever circles that outer region will have encircled the region. It is an opinion that this circling (encirclement) results in a sort of new, noteworthy epiphany.

Finding the relationship between space and light has been an easy assignment. Space has 6 dimensions: the usual height, width, and depth, as well as time, vacuum-ratio, movement away, and movement towards its center. Light travels via depth and, “movement away.” There is no height, or width relative to the scalar dimension of assigned space. Although some might contend there is an inordinate vacuum-ratio concurrent to light’s speed, that only holds true during experimentation with height and width as relative dimensions. My previous post on, “initial sound,” might help clarify. The classic arrangement of light vs its “movement away” phenomena is threefold, as follows:

• Slow speed without acceleration
• Medium speed with acceleration
• Distance travel with no movement or acceleration

Acceleration, as noted above, only exists when relative to space. Sound, or abstract matter has nothing to do with this relativity. Rather, sound is an impulsive result from, “medium speed with acceleration,” without the usual distance-time-movement away relationship. At least, speaking spatially in reference to the usual three dimensions. In the photo below, an image of an actual doorway has been captured while moving through the vacuum-ratio dimension. No sound can travel there, and light can only travel at slow-speed-without-acceleration.

As shown above in the photo, there is a significant amount of apparent blur; this blur is not caused by any shaking of the camera. The blur is a result of the two dimensions, “vacuum-ratio,” and, “movement away,” in antagonistic competition with each other’s scalar value. More photos will follow as long as the camera lens remains intact.