Posts Tagged ‘universe’

Sentient Receding Forays

When counting a sentient receding foray into the doorway of a sixty fifth galaxy, there is always the chance the foray may supersede an earlier event. If counting doorways are done sequentially, an advancement (or progression) can be made into the sixty sixth galaxy without the chance of negative results in a given dimension. Both galaxies can be equidistant from their centers regardless of non-sequential or sequential counting. For example, if a foray into a galaxy reveals 400 or more interplanetary objects, each object can be categorized as blue, yellow, white, tan, and the telltale interspace golden color. No negative result has ever occurred when a sixty sixth galaxy has been discerned, as long as counting is done in sequence, in a doorway. Adding one galaxy to another might only supersede the processed occurrence when an unambiguous method of counting (i.e. subtraction, division, addition) is used. Reconstructing the equidistant galactic centers can be done using material that can be shaped and molded with a minimal amount of pressure and a quick measurement of the material’s mass. These shapes and molds may then be counted and used during a future advancement into a galaxy with astounding results. Sentient receding forays become easy when done correctly, in accordance with space and interspace rules of physics. If by chance the golden color of space is revealed, then counting, advancement, and supersedence could occur frequently with no negative results. Only three minerals may be affected which seem to have no impact on a reconstructed galactic center. The three minerals found near the center have universal dimensions: tall, deep, folded in, and angled. The tallest dimension is measured in inches, the deepest dimension is measured in light years. Angled and “folded in” dimensions are measured by aligning the blue, yellow, and white centers.

 

Waves That Arrive May Pulsate

Waves that arrive may pulsate. Waveforms in excess of 284 cubic meters in volume may encapsulate interior particulates by a special means of adhesion. When an adhesive wave manifests an apparition exceeding 284 cubic meters, new measurements are required to determine the wave and adhesion ratio vis a vis its interior particulates. All particles, by nature, demonstrate the state of being particulates. In this dimension, certain matter can be measured using quantitative particulate measurement. In the 5th and 7th dimension, adhesion waves become the prima facie method of measuring special particles. One may keep in mind that exceeding 300 cubic meters would result in qualitative, rather than quantitative, conclusions.

Using careful particulate-based apparati, the list of interior constructs becomes evident when adhesion between special particles is calculated. The previously mentioned cubic meter reference becomes non sequitur when operating in a dimension higher than 10 (e.g. the 11th dimension, the 32nd dimension, etc.). There is no place for cubic meters in some of the higher dimensions, as planar references are often used in both quantitative and qualitative particulate measurements. Often, the curvature of space will envelope both the first and second cubic meter in both the highest, and second-to-highest dimension when qualitative particulate measurements demonstrate their states of being. Building of sample adhesive waves requires a carefully considered understanding of particulate formulas, not to mention waves and cubic dimensions.

A final thought regarding the movement of the aforementioned waveforms: when sampled in an indeterminate space plane (either inside or outside the universe), some textbooks on adhesion waves might indicate travel both to, and from, their centers causing random confusion amongst the particles. This is sometimes remedied by using more accurate measurements. Intertwining more than 284 cubic meters with exterior particulates adheres to non-informative analysis when dimensions “11″ to “32″ are observed.

 

Announcement: upcoming past space-time lecture

On Monday, July 16, 1257, there will be an formal lecture, followed by an evening get together with a guest speaker and some treats. The lecture will cover three of the topics already covered in this important news blog:

Escalation
Interplanetary Minerals
Space and Dimension

Please note the lecturer is new; no heckling or jokes, and please silence your communicators while attending. As a special treat, we’ll have an evening guest speaker lecturing on:

allegory
universe and its center

After the lecture, some delicious edibles and fresh water will be served.

Please wear clothing appropriate to the 13th century, and if you cannot attend this function, there may be a future lecture announced for the 11th century.

 

Opposite Center of Universe

Some say time is an illusion, others say it is not. Some say that everything has already “happened,” but how can everything have already happened if it hasn’t happened yet? This is where the opposite center of the universe comes into play. In a reality generated by the unconscious during a past plane of time, there is a limit to the generalized boundaries. In fact, the universe has a limit, an edge, in a memorized space-time fragment held in the thoughts of those who have taken the time to commit a universal space to apportioned memory. Directly below, and to the left of this fragmented edge is a space directly opposite the center of the universe. This space does not have a center, as it is fluid, constantly in motion with jagged-edged waves below the crest. Measuring the distance between these two opposite centers is no simple task unless one uses a device designed for such a measurement. Recent calculations tweek the distance figure to be 37, actually closer to 38. This does shift over time. Therefore it is simpler to measure the volume of space directly between the two centers.